How Big Tech is Quietly Creating a New Era of Corporate Dictatorship

Several pieces of literature and media have depicted our future world as a bleak corporate like dictatorship. A world where only a handful of powerful companies own everything we eat, see and do. The mental imagery is vivid, and may even elicit a few eyerolls from most who see the concept as cheesy and far-fetched. Unfortunately, several big tech companies are making such a reality inevitable. 

In the past decade, a handful of Big Tech giants have been quietly buying the intellectual rights to everything they can get their hands on. In 2019 alone; Samsung, IBM, LG, Microsoft & Intel have filed 24,637 patents

1International Business Machines Corp9,262
2Samsung Electronics Co Ltd6,469
3Canon Inc3,548
4Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC3,081
5Intel Corp3,020
6LG Electronics Inc2,805
7Apple Inc2,490
8Ford Global Technologies LLC2,468
9Amazon Technologies Inc2,427
10Huawei Technologies Co Ltd2,418

The data above only accounts for new patents filed in 2019. If you were to zoom out and look at the big picture and see how many patents were filed all in all, it gets much worse:

1Samsung Electronics Co Ltd76,638
2International Business Machines Corp37,304
3Canon Inc35,724
4General Electric Co30,010
5Microsoft Corp29,824
6Robert Bosch GmbH28,285
7Panasonic Corp27,298
8Siemens AG25,320
9Intel Corp24,628
10LG Electronics Inc23,043
A staggering 191,434 patents! Just for 5 companies alone!

This trend will put our advancement as a species in the hands of powerful tech giants. The common man will stand in the shadows and watch, as big tech companies stifle private innovation. Hopefully we aren’t all complicit by simply ignoring the issue. Our eagerness to buy the newest Iphone, shouldn’t distract us from the harrowing implications of patent hoarding tech companies.


Cartoon is from:

Black Lives Matter is Showing Signs of a Communist Agenda

Disclaimer; although most content in this article is factual based, how you choose to perceive the information is subjective, therefore this is an opinion based article. Here at HouseOfVerity we strive to be accurate and honest with our reporting.

Obviously black lives matter, but it’s not as simple as that. Was the plan all along to use Black Lives Matter as a tool to divide us, making it easier to enforce communism? There’s no definitive answer, but here’s why i believe it may be:

  • Advocates are openly hateful to anyone that doesn’t bow down to their beliefs.
  • Criminals are looting businesses in the name of “re-distributing wealth”.
  • Supporters are encouraging a violent war on police, in some cases taking action(violence is used to maintain power in communist countries).
  • Supporters are purposely destroying peoples lives and businesses for speaking out against the movement, or anything they don’t agree on within the movement(it’s publicly known that sometimes communist countries will kill you for speaking out against the government authority).
  • The same political figures who are funding and advocating BLM are openly vocal about their ambitions to enforce socialist/communist laws into the government.
  • Black Lives Matter purposely ignores the deaths of black Americans via black on black crime and black police killing black people; the mainstream media solely focuses on one thing, white police killing black people. This suggests an agenda to divide the country with the ultimate goal of achieving mass control.
  • Black Lives Matter is becoming increasingly Anti-American by censoring free speech, erasing history, and to a lesser extent, pushing to completely change America way beyond racial inequality.

Caring about black lives is not communism, but you have to look at the whole picture. Black lives matter may be a front to introduce communism because of the extend believes beyond racial equality, for example the ambition to disrupt the “western family structure” as listed on the official website;

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.

Listed on the “about” page of

That doesn’t sound too bad, right? It’s more complicated then that. The foundation of capitalism is individualism and equal opportunity for success. Communism and socialism disrupts that, by “Supporting each-other as extended families and villages” they’re non directly stating the goal of black lives matter is to make everyone on the same “level”. It’s important to read through the lines and think about what that really means.

That means socialism. No opportunity to get ahead because everything you earn including property or wealth will be re-distributed to everyone else(and the government) through taxes upwards to 90%. This creates a lazy society because there’s no purpose in pursuing your dreams, considering any form of success obtained as a result of your pursuit will be taken away from you.

Now some people are okay with this because on the flip side, socialism would grant everyone the same access to healthcare, school, and basic necessitates. It makes sense that people like the idea, especially the lower class. But here’s the problem with socialism;

  • Through an economic perspective, pure socialism has many flaws.
  • Even if the economics worked, socialism is bound to be corrupted. If you don’t believe me, ask every single country that’s ever tried it. Pure socialism has literally failed 100% of the time it’s been attempted. Also, it’s usually corrupted and converted into communism.
  • You’re simply giving the government too much power over your life. Why would you want that?

What is communism?

Let’s make something clear, socialism is not communism. The problem is that socialism is the gateway drug to communism, because you’re giving the government control to do whatever they please. Again, as stated above pure socialism has failed 100% of the time that it’s been attempted. So what is communism?

  • Communism is against free speech.
  • Communism is against the freedom of information(government controls the internet, TV, newspapers, etc).
  • Communism is against property ownership(all property belongs to the government, that means you can never own where you live).
  • Communism is against individually(the individual’s best interests are indistinguishable from the society’s best interest).

Look at the countries above, would you want to live in any of those 5 countries? Nope. All 5 of those countries started as socialism before transitioning into the communist countries they are today. Now it’s important to note that not all 5 of these countries are full communist, it’s much more complex then that and difficult to explain. For the sake of this article just be aware these countries are known to censor free speech, take physical action against anyone who speaks out, and more.

Okay, communism is bad. What does that have to do with Black Lives Matter?

  • Let’s start with the violent censorship of free speech;

This is Savannah, a teenage girl and daughter of a Texas police officer who was one of two shot and killed last Saturday after responding to a domestic disturbance call per CBS 11. Whilst mourning his death, she posted on twitter. She said nothing bad or racist at all, which clearly didn’t matter to Black Lives Matter supporters as they ruthlessly attacked her.

Democratic politicians and most people on the left(who also advocate BLM) started a huge boycott of Goya Foods because the CEO made one good comment about trump. It was one small thing he said, that they disagree with, and now they’re out to destroy his name and business.

He even said himself this is a censorship of free speech. Trump is against Black Lives Matter extremists, which is partially why democrats were so upset with this remark. Democrats have never liked Trump but recently they’ve been tying everything into BLM and using it as a manipulation tool to convince us that violence and racism towards whites is okay, in the name of “social justice”.

So If you like Trump you can’t support black lives matter, and if you support black lives matter you can’t like Trump. That’s how they think. There’s no in between, you must pick a side. It’s important to mention Trump has made remarks towards Mexicans years ago that angered democrats, but that’s not a factor today.

Democrats are openly pursuing a divided country by doing this, and a divided country is an easy country to control(enforce communism). If democrats are the warm, accepting, nice people they claim to be, why are they so quick to attack or “cancel” you just because you refuse to bow down to their beliefs? Sounds like their idea of “equality” only matters when it fits their agenda.

Aoc is just one example, for the sake of keeping this article as short as possible i’ll leave out the others

This is Jessica Doty Whitaker, a young mother who was stalked and murdered for saying “all lives matter” to a BLM protester, Per The U.S Sun. She was brutally murdered because she didn’t bow down to the perpetrator. Wow.

These are just a few examples of the democrats/BLM’s attempt to censor free speech. There’s many more, too much for me to put in this article.

  • The left wants to put property ownership rights into the hands of the government;

Ilhan Omar is publicly known for her socialist ambition, which is surprising considering she had to flee a socialist country for safety. The same freedom that America granted her she is now actively trying to get rid of. Ilhan Omar supports Black Lives Matter and condones the riots and destruction, and just like all democratic leaders, has ambitions to enforce policies around the concept.

Ilhan Omar isn’t the only democrat who wants to put property rights into the hands of the government, as several others have made various proposals surrounding the subject. The more power the government has over property rights, the less freedom we have as citizens, therefore the higher likelihood the government will abuse it’s power.

What about black on black crime?

I’m not here to persuade whether or not African Americans are oppressed, though it’s valid to ask why the organization is solely focusing on one part of the problem and not the others. When compared to black on black crime, police brutality is rather insignificant.

In 2019, 235 African Americans were killed by police; just 9 of those people were unarmed. Let that sink in for a second. Any live taken is tragic, but the 7,407 black homicide victims in 2018 are being ignored. I wasn’t able to find a source for 2019’s numbers. Using these statistics, an African American is 31 times more likely to be killed by gun violence then by a police officer. Here’s more on this topic straight from Wall Street Journal;

The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines “unarmed” broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.

-Heather Mac donald via WSJ

Black Lives Matter leaders and advocates have openly stated the organization is not about black on black crime, one notable figure being Don Lemon. Here’s what makes me suspicious;

If they really cared about black lives, they would at least acknowledge that black on black crime is a problem. They’re completely deflecting the issue.

So what does that mean? Probably that Black Lives Matter is out to make people angry at white cops, furthermore initiating a race war. The end result of a race war is a divided country, thus accomplishing a communist’s main goal; constructing a country easier to control.

The people behind Black Lives Matter is a big indicator that it’s just a propaganda machine;

George Soros is the most notable figure as he kick-started Black Lives Matter with a $33 million dollar donation, and has continued to donate more since. Just today it’s been announced that he will donate another whopping $220 million.

The Soros rabbit hole is deep, including theories that he’s directly paying protesters cash to stir up violence in addition to being BLM’s biggest financier. On his foundations website it states;


Open Society Foundation

It’s clear he wants big government, which is a known democratic policy. It doesn’t stop there however, as there’s an overwhelming amount of information linking Soros to a Globalist agenda.

Being a globalist basically means he wants more power for groups such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. It’s communism on steroids, erasing the identity of individual countries and migrating them into one; giving him the power to do whatever he wants with the world.

In 1998 he wrote “as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions”

“On Oct. 26 2019, billionaire George Soros, who has spent his fortune promoting open borders and left-wing politicians, media, and organizations, said he has been impeded by opponents, including President Trump, in his lifelong quest to transform the United States into socialism, which he calls open society.” Per Fellowshipoftheminds

Here’s just a few examples of dirty things Soros has been caught doing;

  • Broke the bank of England
  • Fueling Malaysia’s Economic Crisis
  • Breaking The Bank Of Thailand
  • Trying To Destroy Hong Kong’s Economy
  • Illegally Overspending On Political Campaigns
  • Funded Egyptian terror group Al-Jama’a Al-Islamiyya
  • Deferred $13.3 billion dollars in taxes
  • Insider trading
  • Taken from listverse

Spot a trend here? If you really think George Soros cares about black lives think again. The only life he cares about is his own, and his motives are very clear; rule the world.

Don’t take my word for it, listen to actual immigrants who fled socialist countries and now live in America;

We didn’t cover everything in this article. I tried to make it as compact as I could while still providing valuable information. Even if you disagree with me, hopefully you’ll learn to double check everything the media tells you.

All content in this article belong to their respective owners

Picture above is sourced from

Is Wayfair Child Trafficking? The Internet is up in Flames Over This Conspiracy Theory

  • The theory claims Wayfair may be trafficking children through high priced Cabinets
  • The products in question have been taken off the site
  • Wayfair has made a statement addressing the conspiracy theory

For liability purposes; There’s no proof to any of these claims. That’s why its labeled a conspiracy theory.

The theory originated yesterday on a Reddit post by PrincessPeach1987, and has since blown up on social media. There’s an overwhelming volume of information to read through; I’ve collected some of the major claims and described them here;

Storage cabinets are being sold by WFX Utility for over $10,000 with the same names of missing children

WFX Utility is owned by Wayfair, here is the trademark filed on 2018-07-12

A trademark is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression which identifies products or services of a particular source.

Upon googling the product line I discovered that WFX Utility products are also sold by Walmart, with limited selection and storage cabinets not included. The retail giant only has a few of WFX Utility’s large product line listed. Furthermore, WFX Utility has no independent website or social media page as Wayfair embeds the product line within it’s master store.

Around this time last year, Wayfair employees were protesting an apparent sale of children’s beds to border detention camps;

CNBC reported more than 500 Wayfair employees signed on to a petition and are trying to rally support for a walkout Wednesday to protest the company’s apparent sale of $200,000 of mattresses to a detention camp for migrant children along the Mexican border.

The company sold the mattresses on June 13 to a charity group that works as a federal contractor managing some of the camps along the southern border, according to a copy of the sales receipt obtained by CNBC and verified by an employee. The roughly 1,600 mattresses and 100 bunk beds are scheduled to arrive in Carrizo Springs, Texas, on Wednesday and Thursday, according to the receipt.

Organizers, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by the company, have posted a copy of a letter they sent to management as well as the company’s response to a Twitter account called Wayfairwalkout. They are trying to pressure the company into severing its relationship with Baptist Child and Family Services, the nonprofit that placed the order and is helping to furnish the detention center.

“The United States government and its contractors are responsible for the detention and mistreatment of thousands of migrants seeking asylum in our country,” the employees wrote in an undated letter organizers said was signed by 547 employees. “We want to be sure that Wayfair has no part in enabling, supporting, or profiting from this practice.”

-Wayfair employee activist

Wayfair’s CEO Niraj Shah owns a children’s foundation. It’s called Shah Family Foundation

Using Yandex(a google-like search engine owned by a Russian multinational corporation), numerous social media users discovered something stomach turning when they searched the SKU of certain Wayfair products; the search engine displayed pictures of young girls.

It’s important to note this isn’t limited to WFX Utility, as you can see in the picture on the left the SKU is from an Executive Desk made by Brayden Studio being sold for $15,999.99. This is just one example of several that are circulating social media.

Here’s what Wayfair has to say;

Wayfair told Heavy in an emailed statement: “There is, of course, no truth to these claims. The products in question are industrial grade cabinets that are accurately priced.” The company explained why the items in question had been removed from the site.

Recognizing that the photos and descriptions provided by the supplier did not adequately explain the high price point, we have temporarily removed the products from site to rename them and to provide a more in-depth description and photos that accurately depict the product to clarify the price point.


The conspiracy is being met with criticism, including from Samiyah Mumin who is alive and well

“Who are you? How are you going to post about me being missing when you don’t even know me?

-Samiyah Mumin

Victoria Brownworth is an investigative journalist, and self proclaimed real life socialist.

I’d like to note that Wayfair isn’t the only big box retailer selling extremely expensive cabinets, Walmart has one too.

All content featured in this article belong to their respective owners.